Eugene O'Neill
1888-1953
Life
Family
- His father, James O'Neill, played title role in The Count of Monte
Cristo for years and became identified with the role; a woman named
Nettie Walsh sued him three months after his marriage to Ellen and claimed
to be married to him.
- His mother, Ellen Quinlan O'Neill, became addicted to morphine during
her recovery after Eugene's birth; she blamed her addiction on her husband,
who she said did not spend the money to get her a good doctor.
- His brother Jamie O'Neill gave measles to his other brother, Edmund,
who died in infancy.
- His brother Edmund O'Neill died in infancy of measles contracted from
Jamie.
Home
- New York, New York
- Provincetown, Massachusetts
- France
Religion
- raised in Catholic family
- attended Catholic schools
Chronology
- 1888: born in New York City
- 1906-1907: attends Princeton University in New Jersey
- 1909: marries Kathleen Jenkins
- 1910: becomes a sailor, but leaves the ship in Buenos Aires and becomes
a beggar
- 1911: sails back to New York, where he lives in poverty
- 1911: overdoses on Veronal in an attempt to kill himself
- 1912: divorced from Kathleen Jenkins
- 1912-1913: spends six months at Gaylord Farm Sanitorium, where he receives
treatment for tuberculosis
- 1914-1915: studies playwriting under George Pierce Baker at Harvard
University in Cambridge, Massachusetts
- c.1916: moves to Provincetown, Massachusetts
- 1916: Bound East for Cardiff produced by Provincetown Players
- 1920: Beyond the Horizon produced at Morosco Theatre in New
York City
- 1918: marries Agnes Boulton
- 1920-1939
- 1921: Anna Christie
- 1920: The Emperor Jones
- 1922: The Hairy Ape produced in New York City
- 1924: All God's Chillun Got Wings produced in New York City
- 1924: Desire Under the Elms produced in New York City
- 1926: The Great God Brown produced in New York City
- 1928: Lazarus Laughed produced in Pasadena, California
- 1928: Strange Interlude achieves huge success
- 1929: marries Carlotta Monterey
- 1931: Mourning Becomes Electra produced in New York City
- 1933: Ah, Wilderness! produced in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
and New York City
- c.1940: suffers from a hereditary nervous disease
- 1940-1941: writes and revises Long Day's Journey Into Night,
but asks that it not be performed until 25 years after his death
- 1946: The Iceman Cometh produced in New York City
- 1947: Moon for the Misbegotten produced in Columbus, Ohio
- 1953: dies in Boston, Massachusetts
- 1956: Long Day's Journey Into Night performed a few years after
his death with his widow's permission despite O'Neill's wish that it not
be produced until 25 years after this death
- 1958: A Touch of the Poet produced in New York City
Issues and themes
Dramatic innovations
- Break from melodrama: "His career, so tied to this generation
of theatrical personnel, should be judged within its historical context,
as a reaction against melodrama and a search for a theatrical aesthetic
to replace it" (Jensen 139).
- "Supernaturalism": "In The Web O'Neill explored
realism; in Thirst, written in fall 1913 and produced in summer
1916, he explored, as he would in The Hairy Ape, what he would later
refer to as supernaturalism, which to O'Neill meant going beyond realism
by using sybolism in a basically realistic play" (Jensen 143).
- Expressionism: ". . . the yielding up of the realistic and naturalistic
method of verisimilitude in order to use external objects not as representational
but as transmitters of the internal impressions and moods" (Holman
187); "The Emperor Jones was the first American play to adapt
expressionistic techniques" (Jensen 151)
- Miscellaneous innovations include spoken thoughts (Strange Interlude),
masks (The Great God Brown), chorus (Lazarus Laughed), lighting,
and set
Past
Pipe dreams
Work
Long Day's Journey Into Night
Act One
- What is the significance of the books in the Tyrones' library? How
do you interpret O'Neill's note that the books "have the look of having
been read and reread"? Who do you suppose has been reading them?
- Why is it significant that Tyrone is an actor?
- Analyze the tone of the play. Pay particular attention to the fluctuations
in it. Is there a general tone?
- How do you feel toward the Tyrones? Sympathetic? Angry? Frustrated?
Why?
- Interpret the various characters' appearances. Why do the other characters
return again and again to Mary's size? What is significant about Jamie's
appearance and bearing?
- What is the nature of Mary and James' relationship? Consider her comments
about his snoring and his reaction.
- What is the nature of James' relationship with Jamie? How has it come
to be this way?
- What are James' politics?
- All of the characters continually seek explanations for their situations.
What explanations do they find? Which ones do they not consider?
- O'Neill often notes that a character is "Stung." What does
he mean? Why are the characters so often "Stung"?
- How do James and Jamie react Mary's unusual behavior during the night?
Why? What does this reaction suggest about their personalities?
- How might the fog be a metaphor. Consider Mary's lines: "I mean,
take advantage of the sunshine before the fog comes back" and "Because
I know it will."
- Describe Mary Tyrone. What does she want? What does she miss?
- Look carefully at the lines Mary delivers from a daze, such as "That's
what makes it so hard-for all of us. We can't forget." How do these
lines function in the play?
- How do the characters, particularly James Tyrone, react to accusations
made toward them? What is significant about these reactions?
- "This family is so confused that they can't go two minutes without
giving each other harsh insults. Before you know it, they're apologizing
and professing their love for each other again. The Tyrones never established
a basis for family or for the love a family is supposed to be made of,
so they are left to wander around in the fog that they have created for
themselves" (Kimmel 11/13/96).
- Mary's "nervousness comes out rather obviously by her frequent
fidgeting. For instance, her self-conscious nature is show when she constantly
messes with her hair when someone is staring at her. Also, her nervousness
stops her from being able to control her hands. They are never still, which
draws attention to them" (Smith 11/12/96).
Act Two
- Jamie warns Edmund that he should quit drinking because of his illness,
and Edmund responds: "Oh, I'm going to after he hands me the bad news
this afternoon. A few before then won't make any difference" (55).
How do you interpret this line?
- What is the definition of the word "cynicism"? Is Jamie more
or less cynical than he should be? See his speech on page 57, particularly
the lines: "Listen, Kid, I know you think I'm a cynical bastard, but
remember I've seen a lot more of this game than you have."
- Why does Mary take drugs? Support your answer.
- In one of her many soliloquies, Mary says: "None of us can help
the things life has done to us. They're done before you realize it, and
once they're done they make you do other things until at last everything
comes between you and what you'd like to be, and you've lost your true
self forever" (61). Do you agree? Why or why not? Are the Tyrones
trapped by their past? What aspects of their past have helped to shape
their lives?
- What is Edmund's outlook on life? Consider his response to Tyrone's
toast of "Well, here's health and happiness!": "That's a
joke!" (66).
- Analyze the part of the scene on pages 66-68. How is this section rich
with information about the entire play's themes and characterizations?
- Read the final line of Act Two, Scene One. Why do you think O'Neill
chose to end the scene on this line?
- Analyze O'Neill's descriptions of characters' facial expressions, such
as his description of Tyrone at the beginning of Act Two, Scene Two. How
do these descriptions help to convey O'Neill's themes?
- Read Jamie's line on page 76: "I was merely putting bluntly what
we all know, and have to live with now, again." What is the significance
of the word "again" here?
- We can learn a great deal about these characters' struggles from the
exchange on pages 87-88. Analyze this passage from the play.
- "[Mary's] husband, Tyrone, and also Jamie drink too much alcohol.
They do this to escape from the reality of Mary having a drug addiction.
They, too, are putting themselves in a fog, to hide from the reality of
their family life" (Barham 11/12/96).
Act Three
- Interpret Mary's line at the beginning of this act: "It will soon
be night, thank goodness" (102).
- Analyze Mary's idealistic memories of the past, particularly her description
of her introduction to James before their marriage (112). How do these
passages function in the play?
- What is the significance of the words that both Mary and James use
in proclaiming their love for each other: ". . . in spite of everything"
(112)?
- Analyze the way the Tyrones deal with reality. Consider the references
to lies, such as Edmund's description of the revelation of his mother's
illness: "I remember, all right. It was right after that Papa and
Jamie decided they couldn't hide it from me any more. Jamie told me. I
called him a liar! I tried to punch him in the nose. But I knew he wasn't
lying" (118). Also, pay attention to the references to the fog, including
Edmund's description of his walk in the fog (131).
- Analyze the emotions that the Tyrones experience in this play. In particular,
consider the exchange between Edmund and Mary on pages 118-120.
- How do the Tyrones drag one another down? Consider the exchange between
Edmund and Mary on page 120.
Act Four
- What can we learn about the Tyrones from their choice of reading?
- What is the significance of Mary's dream of being a nun? Why do you
suppose this dream is still so active in her mind?
- Edmund says to his father: "We don't seem to be able to avoid
unpleasant topics, do we?" Why do you think the Tyrones continually
return to "unpleasant topics"? Why do even their shows of affection
give way to explosive expressions of anger, bitterness, and hatred?
- All four members of the family are under the influence of either drugs
or alcohol in this act. What are the consequences, particularly in terms
of the themes of the play? Tyrone repeatedly explains Mary's complaints
and accusations by saying that "it's the poison talking." Do
you agree? How do the various "poisons" affect the Tyrones and
their words?
- Who is Edwin Booth, and how does the allusion to him on page 150 function
in the play?
- After his father's long confession, Edmund says: "I'm glad you've
told me this, Papa. I know you a lot better now." What is the significance
of this line?
- How is Edmund's description of his life on a ship Emersonian? How is
it Naturalistic? How is it Existential?
- "As it is," Edmund tells his father, "I will always
be a stranger who never feels at home, who does not really want and is
not really wanted, who can never belong, who must always be a little in
love with death." Why is home so important to Edmund and Mary? Why
do they believe they have never had one?
- "What a bastard to have for a father!" Jamie says to Edmund
in Act Four. "Christ, if you put him in a book, no one would believe
it!" (157). What is the significance of this line?
- Explaining that their father has agreed to send him to any sanatorium,
Edmund adds: "Within reason, of course" (158). Why do you think
that he says this "without resentment"?
- Why, according to Jamie, is he so devastated by his mother's return
to morphine?
- Analyze the characters' motivations. Why, for example, did Jamie provide
such a bad example for Edmund?
- Analyze the final moments of Long Day's Journey Into Night.
Consider Mary's words, the characters' actions, the position of the characters,
and other elements that help to shape our final impression of the play.
- Review the notes of Eugene O'Neill's life. What parallels do you see
in this play? Why do you think O'Neill depicted his family's life in this
way? Why do you suppose he used the name of his dead brother for himself?
- What is the "Long Day's Journey Into Night"?
- In Act Four of Long Day's Journey Into Night, Eugene O'Neill
opens up at the end of the play. One characteristic of this work is that
the reader doesn't really know what happens in the past. The reader is
given brief bits and pieces of their pasts, but it's not until everyone
is either drunk or high on morphine that the truth really comes out. Edmund
talks of his trip out to sea and how hard work didn't pay and how he thought
James was too cheap" (Aron 11/13/96).
- "I'm not one for abrupt endings, so that's why I didn't like it.
It made me leave the script feeling uneasy about what was going to happen
to the characters, which was probably O'Neill's goal. Maybe he wanted the
audience to go home and create their own endings, but this simply bothers
me" (Smith 11/14/96).
- "A lot transpires in Act Four of the play, though nothing ever
really seems to be resolved. One thing of importance is that it is within
Act Four that every member of the family is drugged up in some way or another.
It is also the portion of the play when everyone is the most honest with
each other. This reminds me of a quote, 'A drunk man's words are a sober
man's thoughts.' I think that this quote is very pertinent to this family.
For example, Jamie tells Edmund that he did purposely try to ruin him and
that he was very jealous of him, and so forth and so on" (Plonk 11/14/96).
- "This scene made me feel as though [Mary] did not follow her actual
calling in life and that she never should have gotten married. But I also
got the feeling that she was idealizing the life in the nunnery. She never
experienced that life, so it is easy for her to imagine it as wonderful.
She probably would have ended up wondering what it would be like to be
married had she become a nun. I think this because she was apparently happy
at one point with her lifewith Tyrone. Just as this happiness faded, so
would her happiness in the nunnery" (Plonk 11/14/96).
- Edmund "refuses to let Tyrone send him to a cheap sanitarium.
After being confronted, Tyrone gives in. This, along with the light-bulbs,
are the only examples of Tyrone compromising his frugality. Both of these
occur as a result of Edmund's confrontation, suggesting that only Edmund
has the ability to get through to Tyrone" (Lasher 11/14/96).
- "It is evident that some type of symbolism is associated with
the light, as if the bulbs represent shedding light on the true nature
of the characters" (Lasher 11/14/96).
- "We could tell that the Tyrones lived in a haze and desperately
wanted to live in the past or anything that detached them from the reality
of now. I guess that Mary is happy in several ways then. First, she seems
totally aloof and almost unconscious of the goings-on around her. Secondly,
she is having fanciful visions of the past. To her dismay, however, her
little dream ends with meeting Tyrone and falling not only in love but
also falling in the reality of now" (Edwards 10/17/96).
- Tyrone and Jamie "begin bickering back and forth, and then Tyrone
finally turns all of the lights on. I think this is symbolic because everything
seems brought out into the open, or, rather, the characters seem able to
face the horrible reality of their situations" (Catt 11/12/96).
General
- "O'Neill utilizes the fact that this is a play by allowing readers
to realize that the character's lives are already planned out for them,
limiting their ability to grow and change" (Baldwin 10/7/96).
- "Soliloquies and asides function together in this novel chiefly
as a way to provide the audience with information that may not be common
knowledge to them. The asides and soliloquies of Mary Tyrone expose her
personal depression over her past, reasons for her drug use, and the past
actions and beliefs of her husband and two sons. By combining all of the
information provided in her soliloquuies and asides, a greater knowledge
and understanding of the play and its characters can be achieved"
(Brooks 11/12/96).
- "Through his use of a single set, O'Neill seems to be hinting
at the isolation that the family has from the outside world and the way
that they cannot escape from their web of guilt, lies, and addiction"
(Butler 11/12/96).
- "Through the long conversation between Edmund and Tyrone, it becomes
apparent that one of the problems that the family has had has been their
lack of understanding of each other, which stems from their unwillingness
to openly and honestly speak the truth. In this act, Edmund, who is by
far the most sympathetic character, finally confronts his father about
his miserly attitude and philosophy, and Tyrone responds with guilt, rage,
and the truth about why he is the way he is. From Tyrone's response, Edmund
develops a deeper understanding of his father, and he loses a portion of
the bitterness he has felt toward him for all the many years for being
cheap" (Butler 11/14/96).
- "Frequently, O'Neill asks for the characters to stare or look
away from the speaker. This is important because knowing where one looks
allows us to infer how they are feeling. For example, the boys have trouble
looking at their mother when they know she has been taking morphine again.
When they refuse to look at her, we can infer they are both angry and hurt"
(Plonk 11/12/96).
- "Another important dramatic [device] is the use of countless emotional
directions. The characters are given directions such as 'resentfully,'
'bitterly,' caustically,' 'blankly,' 'strickenly,' 'pleadingly,' 'dully,'
'hopelessly,' 'indifferently,' 'excitedly,' 'cynically,' 'defiantly,' 'miserably,'
'furiously,' 'vaguely,' 'injuredly,' 'resentfully,' 'violently,' 'dryly,'
and 'persuasively,' to name but a few. It is clear that O'Neill felt that
emotion was a critical element in the portrayal of these characters. In
fact, since the characters never actually do anything, their emotions are
all that we have" (Lasher 11/13/96).
- "Everyone idealizes his or her past, which is no way to live a
life. It isn't healthy to always be wishing you were back somewhere else"
(Ryan 11/15/96).
- Review of production starring Katharine Hepburn: "Another thing
I noticed was how the cameras were always above eye level when showing
the characters, . . . looking down on them as they spoke, which may be
a way of subconsciously conveying the pitifulness of this family to the
audience" (Ryan 11/18/96).
- "Mary is a very fidgety person. This could symbolize the nervousness
and defensiveness of the entire family. Her moves are jerky and quick,
much as the family is quick to lay blame, be defensive, and hastily switch
from one topic to another before too much information is revealed"
(Hundley 11/11/96).
- "[Mary] reminds me of a small child who is carrying around a security
blanket. I believe that the only sense of security that Mary has comes
from her idealized version of the past" (Hundley 11/13/96).
- "The final aspect I found interesting is the card game between
Edmund and Tyrone. They kept forgetting whose turn it was. This reminded
me of the way in which the family continually argues, forgetting what the
central issue is or dancing around the central issue. The card game is
the central issue, but they keep getting distracted by their conversation.
This is much like the present is the central issue, but the family is distracted
by the past, due to Mary's constant obsession with it" (Hundley 11/13/96).
- "Unlike his wife, Mary, James's past is not the center of a personal
depression and hatred of life. Instead, the past stands mainly as a shaper
of his personal ideals and actions" (Brooks 5).
- "James naturally expects the most out of his kids as a result
of the high expectations that have always surrounded him" (Brooks
6).
- Review of production starring Jack Lemmon: "The play that we watched
on TV helped further my image of the disfunctional family and the stubbornness
that each character had towards the others. This was especially evident
in their arguments, when each person tried to talk over the others in order
to get his/her point across. Because of this, it seemed like none of the
[characters] ever really listened or paid attention to the others"
(Daugherty 11/24/96).
- "The act opens with Tyrone alone, playing cards mechanically.
Edmund enters, and their ensuing conversation sets the tone for the climactic
act. This episode is typical of the exchanges in this family. It moves
from affection ('You're a wonder, Papa . . .') to condescension ('You have
a poet in you but it's a damned morbid one!') to denial ('Lies! He's a
liar . . .')" (Premakumar 11/14/96).
- "I . . . think the fact that it is the 'living' room is ironic.
It is in this room that the men drink to escape life" (Wallen 11/7/96).
- "It also seems like this play is a cycle that could continue day
in and day out. It would be interesting if O'Neill is making the characters
so drunk at these times that they do not remember what they talked about
in the morning; their memory would be foggy. If so, the play becomes one
that will never come to a happy ending. If the only time they make progress
with each other is when they are so drunk they do not remember it later,
they have not really made any progress at all" (Wallen 11/12/96).
- Review of film production starring Jack Lemmon: "In the movie
adaptation of Eugene O'Neill's Long Day's Journey into Night with
Jack Lemmon and Kevin Spacey, one of the most striking characteristics
of the production is the setting in which the action overwhelmingly finds
its place. The characters all interact within a tight and confined space
that leaves them little room to hide from either each other or themselves.
When reading the play, my mind's eyes envisioned a larger and more hollowed
house that contained and hid the many underlying subplots and internal
decay of the characters. The film offered a much smaller and more cluttered
space for the actors to work with, ensuring that collision between them
was inevitable and unavoidable. Apparently, the purpose of this particular
type of setting was to take the focus away from the surroundings and place
it firmly on the conflicts between the characters. The story itself suggests
that the Tyrone family continually meets up together despite their constant
bickering, and this environment creates not only the perfect stage but
also the perfect atmosphere in which the collisions can be acted out. The
setting is a subtle mechanism to reinforce and heighten the turmoil within
the Tyrone family" (Daigneault 12/1/96).
- Review of production starring Jack Lemmon: "Tyrone . . . becomes
less refined as it gets later into the movie. He complains constantly throughout
the movie, but the more he drinks, the more he loses his class" (Smith
11/19/96).
- Review of production starring Jack Lemmon: The "many bare wooden
walls and lack of curtains" show that "the house is merely a
house, not a home" (Gregory 12/96).
Bibliography
Life
- Gelb, Arthur, and Barbara Gelb. O'Neill. New York: Harper, 1962.
- Jensen, George H. "Eugene O'Neill." Dictionary of Literary
Biography. Volume 7.
- Scheaffer, Louis. O'Neill: Son and Playwright. Boston: Little,
Brown, 1968.
- -. O'Neill: Son and Artist. Boston: Little, Brown, 1973.
Issues and themes
- Bogard, Travis. Contour in Time: The Plays of Eugene O'Neill,
1988.
- Holman, C. Hugh, and William Harmon. A Handbook to Literature.
Sixth Edition. New York: Macmillan, 1992.
- Jensen, George H. "Eugene O'Neill." Dictionary of Literary
Biography. Volume 7.
- Winther, S.K. Eugene O'Neill, a Critical Study, 1934.
Interpretation of work
- Aron, Chad. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill. November 13, 1996.
- Baldwin, Kara. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. October 7, 1996.
- Barham, Susan. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. November 12, 1996.
- Brooks, Robbie. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. November 12, 1996.
- ---. "The Past: A Model for Human Existence and Interaction: Eugene
O'Neill's Recognition of the Past and Its Importance in Long Day's Journey
Into Night. English 28. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Fall 1996.
- Butler, Chris. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. November 12, 1996.
- ---. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill. November 14, 1996.
- Catt, Cynthia. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. November 12, 1996.
- Daigneault, Ralph. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. December 1, 1996.
- Daugherty, Walt. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. November 24, 1996.
- Edwards, Wesley. Journal of English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. October 17, 1996.
- Gregory, Andy. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. December 1996.
- Hundley, Ann. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. November 11, 1996.
- ---. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill. November 13, 1996.
- Kimmel, Jeremy. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. November 13, 1996.
- Lasher, Todd. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. November 13, 1996.
- ---. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill. November 14, 1996.
- Plonk, Sara. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill. November 12, 1996.
- Premakumar, Raj. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. November 14, 1996.
- Ryan, Cory. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill. November 15, 1996.
- ---. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill. November 18, 1996.
- Smith, Jenny. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. November 12, 1996.
- ---. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill. November 19, 1996.
- ---. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill. November 14, 1996.
- Wallen, Stephanie. Journal for English 28. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill. November 7, 1996.
© Mark
Canada, 1997
Quoting any of the phrases or paraphrasing any of the ideas on this site
without citing this site is plagiarism, a serious form of academic misconduct
that can result in failure of a course, dismissal from a university, or
both.
- If you use the citation style suggested by Janice R. Walker, co-author
of the Columbia Guide to Online Style and author of "MLA-Style
Citations of Electronic Sources" on the World Wide Web, a reference
to this site on a "Works Cited" page would appear as follows:
- Canada, Mark, ed. "Eugene O'Neill." Canada's America.
1997. http://www.uncp.edu/home/canada/work/canam/oneill.htm (*).
*Inside the parentheses, type the date on which you are viewing this
site.